Отзывы на New Tab Override
New Tab Override от Sören Hentzschel
Отзывы Пользователь Firefox 14320088
Оценено на 2 из 5
от Пользователь Firefox 14320088, 6 лет назадWill not allow loading local files on Ubuntu / Linux.
No, "Mozilla doesn't allow this functionality" is not an answer. I have a different extension, with the same local file, working perfectly fine on Windows 8.1 but it refuses to load on Ubuntu. This extension doesn't even make an attempt to load the file. It's HTML, CSS, JS so the semi support doesn't work (and isn't a real fix because I want changes to be made immediate which is why it's a local file in the first place). The only use I have for this extension does not work so it is immediately uninstalled.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edit: I don't think I can reply to developer comments so I will here instead.
Firstly, I don't need to make a GitHub issue because this isn't GitHub. This is the review section of mozilla.org where I review the extension I downloaded that doesn't do what I wanted it to. Secondly, I did say exactly what is wrong. If the path does not start with http:// or https:// the extension refuses to load without even trying. This is not a technical reason, this is a developmental choice and why the other extension loads on Windows (because it doesn't give up the moment I input my file path). Lastly, the other extension works on Windows 8.1 and 10 merely by inputting file:// (path to file) despite it too saying it's not supported. The steps to reproduce the two star review are: 1) choose new URL 2) input anything that's not http:// or https:// 3) immediately uninstall and leave a poor review reflecting this design choice.
Thank you for making the extension (I didn't rate it one star) but the extensions design choice makes it unusable for local file hosting which works despite it not being officially supported. All I need(ed) it to do was auto open an HTML file from my machine (not cache but actually open to access ./css, ./js, etc) but I have since worked around this issue.
No, "Mozilla doesn't allow this functionality" is not an answer. I have a different extension, with the same local file, working perfectly fine on Windows 8.1 but it refuses to load on Ubuntu. This extension doesn't even make an attempt to load the file. It's HTML, CSS, JS so the semi support doesn't work (and isn't a real fix because I want changes to be made immediate which is why it's a local file in the first place). The only use I have for this extension does not work so it is immediately uninstalled.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edit: I don't think I can reply to developer comments so I will here instead.
Firstly, I don't need to make a GitHub issue because this isn't GitHub. This is the review section of mozilla.org where I review the extension I downloaded that doesn't do what I wanted it to. Secondly, I did say exactly what is wrong. If the path does not start with http:// or https:// the extension refuses to load without even trying. This is not a technical reason, this is a developmental choice and why the other extension loads on Windows (because it doesn't give up the moment I input my file path). Lastly, the other extension works on Windows 8.1 and 10 merely by inputting file:// (path to file) despite it too saying it's not supported. The steps to reproduce the two star review are: 1) choose new URL 2) input anything that's not http:// or https:// 3) immediately uninstall and leave a poor review reflecting this design choice.
Thank you for making the extension (I didn't rate it one star) but the extensions design choice makes it unusable for local file hosting which works despite it not being officially supported. All I need(ed) it to do was auto open an HTML file from my machine (not cache but actually open to access ./css, ./js, etc) but I have since worked around this issue.
Ответ разработчика
размещено 6 лет назадAnd where is your GitHub issue where you are showing the other add-on and you local file? Sorry, it's not okay to give such reviews and telling the add-on does something wrong and not to say what exactly is wrong. And honestly, I can't believe that it works on Windows and not on Linux. So please provide the test case and steps to reproduce before giving bad reviews…
961 отзыв
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18385732, 25 дней назадan annoying bug:
when you open a new tab , then go for a url , u cannot highlight a word for copy,it turn grey, disable this plugin can solve the problem. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Edgar, месяц назад
- Оценено на 4 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 17940157, месяц назадAll good and functional. Only feedback I'd give is for it not to bring me to my selected page when I open a new tab with ctrl+shift+T which is when I want to bring back a previous page and not have it be overtaken by the tab homepage :)
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18342233, 2 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18316801, 2 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от ishygddt_, 3 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Moono, 4 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Daitetu2, 4 месяца назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 14005394, 4 месяца назадStopped working today. Absolutely does not set focus to the web page instead of the address bar. The cursor jumps to the address bar every time I try to type in the Google search field. Also will not open new tabs to my home page. Instead it opens to Firefox home page.
Ответ разработчика
размещено 3 месяца назадPlease do not abuse the review system for support requests. If it suddenly stopped it's clear that it can't be the fault of New Tab Override as there was no update at the time of your review. Also there was no other similar report. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 15009184, 4 месяца назад
- Оценено на 1 из 5от user129397u5238991230sd23124ae12, 4 месяца назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Voynich, 5 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 17862970, 5 месяцев назадRE: Thank you for addressing the issue. Before rating the extension, I unpacked it and looked at the code. It didn't make any sense to me why it had that as part of validation.
Thanks a lot, Sören.
Can't set custom homepage with custom protocol e.g. moz-extension://Ответ разработчика
размещено 3 месяца назадYou can use moz-extension:// URIs now. In the future, please request features via appropriate channels instead of abusing the review system. Maybe you want to consider a better review now as your only point of criticism was addressed. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Device Problem, 5 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 4 из 5от Speede-du-potar, 5 месяцев назадThis Add-on can't decipher characters with French accents. Too bad.
And when he opens my page, there's a big frame all around it, which takes up too much space on a small screen! - Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18203154, 5 месяцев назадWorks just as described. In the options I pasted in the page I wanted to load on each new tab, and now it's just click and there it is. Thanks!
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Kevin, 5 месяцев назадWorks great on desktop. Can we get compatability for Firefox mobile please?
Ответ разработчика
размещено 5 месяцев назадThank you!
It's technically not possible to support Firefox for Android as Firefox for Android does not have a tabs WebExtension API. - Оценено на 5 из 5от Thomas Sears, 5 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 5 из 5от KC, 5 месяцев назадSimple, the extension does exactly what it is suppose to. 100 Percent!
- Оценено на 5 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18073645, 6 месяцев назад
- Оценено на 3 из 5от Пользователь Firefox 18174079, 6 месяцев назадKind of useless if the URL isn't automatically selected in a new tab. Having to ctlr+a and delete the url in each new tab before being able to type is not very helpful.
Ответ разработчика
размещено 6 месяцев назадIt would be nice if you would ask before giving bad reviews for add-ons since what you want is not possible at all for WebExtensions. As there is no way to this, it's not fair to get a bad review for that reason. And by the way, 70,000 other users don't think that the add-on is "useless".